澳洲代写essay：自由的圣斗士
澳洲代写essay：自由的圣斗士
这些关于自由根本的矛盾观点继续在各方之间产生政治上的分歧，并导致了所谓的“自由的圣斗士”。必须了解的是，由于经济原因，胡佛主要反对罗斯福的想法。美国的金融深度已经很深，用他的话来说，这导致了巨额的支出，可能会在未来两代中偿还。他认为，新交易不仅仅是自由，而是要为一个为政府毫无结果的愚蠢行为而努力的人的奴役。因此，与罗斯福的一个强有力的政府的自由观念相反，胡佛认为“根本的美国自由受到威胁。共和党是否准备好了这个问题？你是否愿意将所有问题都投入到这个问题上，还是你会动摇并回头看？或者你是否决定进入神圣的十字军争取自由，这将决定一个自由人的国家的未来和永恒？ （胡佛，1936）
澳洲代写essay：自由的圣斗士
然而，必须明白的是，追求自由并没有在此结束，并且由于全国妇女党不懈努力启动的1922年“平等权利修正法”的美德，所有基于性别的非法歧视都被男性和女性。这种新发现的妇女自由赋予妇女受教育权和经济独立权。因此，自由不仅局限于社会政治方面，而且体现在个人权利和自由方面。有人正确地评论说：“公民的政治权利并不依赖于性，而是社会和家庭关系”（Geidel，1980）。另一方面，在社会的黑人或有色人种之间，他们还没有得到实现，他们被双重剥夺，从美国的主流生活中被剥夺。
澳洲代写essay：自由的圣斗士
These conflicting ideas on the fundamental of liberties continued to create a political rift among the parties and resulted in what would be known as the ‘holy crusade for liberty’. It must be understood that Hoover had mainly opposed the idea of Roosevelt because of the economic reasons. America was already deep in financial depths, which in his words, had resulted in gigantic expenditures that would be possible to be repaid by the next two generations. In his opinion, the New Deals had amounted not to freedom but to the slavery of a man who would be exercising his efforts for the fruitless follies of the government. Therefore, contrary to Roosevelt’s idea of liberty from a powerful government, Hoover contended that “fundamental American liberties are at stake. Is the Republican Party ready for the issue? Are you willing to cast your all upon the issue, or would you falter and look back? Or have you determined to enter the holy crusade for liberty that shall determine the future and the perpetuity for a nation of free man? (Hoover, 1936)
澳洲代写essay：自由的圣斗士
However, it must be understood that the quest for liberty did not end here and by the virtue of the 1922 Equal Rights Amendment Act, initiated by the relentless endeavor of the National Women’s party, all the illegal gender-based discrimination was abolished between the men and women. This newfound liberty for women granted the women right to education and economic independence. Therefore, liberty was not just confined on the socio-political front, but has manifested in terms of individual right and freedom. It was rightly commented that, “The political right of citizens is not properly dependent upon sex, but social and domestic relations” (Geidel, 1980). On the other hand, it was yet to be realized among the black or the colored section of the society, who were two-fold removed and deprived from the mainstream life of America.
