论文代写：陪审团在处理案件中作用

论文代写：陪审团在处理案件中作用

弗兰克嘲弄安德鲁和安德鲁，以攻击弗兰克作为报复。作为回应，弗兰克回击了他，导致安德鲁被杀。在这个前提下，弗兰克攻击安德鲁时正在流血。许多判例法解释了挑衅的概念。可以认为弗兰克受到了极端的挑衅。这些可能会导致陪审团宣判弗兰克无罪，他杀死了安德鲁，并以过失杀人罪将他定罪。这将在一个个案中被考虑，普通人条款。第二个因素是过度自卫的普通法因素。

论文代写：陪审团在处理案件中作用

陪审团需要确信弗兰克认为安德鲁造成了更多的人身攻击。最终，案件落到了弗兰克的精神状态上。他的行动需要得到保证。他的精神状态和杀害安德鲁的特殊行为的原因需要详细确定。陪审团可以提出有利于弗兰克的案子。最后，弗兰克需要向陪审团证明他的精神状态，以便做出判案。这将取决于弗兰克如何能向陪审团证明他的行为不是预先调解的，以及获得减刑甚至无罪释放的确切因果关系。

论文代写：陪审团在处理案件中作用

Frank taunted Andrew and Andrew retaliated by attacking Frank. As a response Frank attacked him back causing Andrew to be killed. In this premise, Frank was bleeding when he attacked Andrew. Many of the case laws explain the notions of provocation. It could be argued that Frank was under extreme provocation. These might lead to the jury to acquit Frank of killing Andrew and convict him under manslaughter. This will be considered on a case by case ordinary person clause. The second factor is the common law element of excessive self-defense.

论文代写：陪审团在处理案件中作用
The jury needs to be convinced that Frank assumed Andrew to cause him more physical assault. Ultimately, the case falls upon the mind state of Frank. His actions need to be warranted. His state of mind and the reason for his particular action of killing Andrew needs to be determined in detail. The Jury could make a case that would favour Frank. To conclude, Frank needs to prove his state of mind to the jury in order to make a case determination. It would depend on how Frank is able to prove to the jury that his actions were not premediated and the exact causal effect to gain a reduced sentence or even acquittal.