论文代写：公司违规案例

论文代写：公司违规案例

埃森顿足球俱乐部正面临一系列的违规行为，并因其处理员工的行为而被罚款。这家公司在两大问题上纠缠不清。它创造了一个不安全的工作环境，并确保对不符合医生指示的药物的同意。他们被发现以违反第21(1)条作为替代。这部分是关于没有为员工提供和维护和创造安全的工作场所。第2条违反第21(2)(a)款(Windholz, 2015)。在这个案件中发现了一个漏洞。下面将更详细地解释这些漏洞。公司违背了为员工提供安全和工作环境的承诺。公司需要为员工提供一个安全的工作场所。

论文代写：公司违规案例

这是该公司面临罚款和公众反对的主要原因。公司没有为工人提供一个安全的环境。他们不遵守法律，因此被罚款。第二个因素是未能维护合理实践的工作系统。这些都是公司忽视的风险。他们没有遵守医生开给员工的护理标准。在这家公司工作的医生不懂法律。他们未经员工的许可就给员工开了药。这是严重的违规行为。因此，该公司面临指控。公司没有妥善处理同意问题。负责治疗这名员工的医生没有正确地履行护理职责。这些导致了公众的强烈反对和政府的罚款。公司采取的措施是不够的。

论文代写：公司违规案例

Essendon Football Club is facing a number of violation and has been fined for its actions in treatment of their employee. The company had indulged in two major issues. It was the creation of an unsafe working environment and ensuring consent for the medications that did not comply with the terms indicated by the doctors. They were found to be in lieu with the breach of section 21(1). This section is about the failure to provide and maintain for employees and creation of safe working place. The second breach is the breach of the section 21(2)(a) (Windholz, 2015). A breach has been observed in this case. A more detailed explanation of the breaches is explained in the following.The company breached its promise of providing safe and working environment to the employees. The company needs to have provided the people with a safe place to work.

论文代写：公司违规案例
This was primarily the main cause for the company to face the fines and public backlash. The company did not provide with a safe environment for the workers. They were not compliant with the law and hence they were fined. The second factor is the failure to maintain a system of work that is reasonably practices. They were risks that the company overlooked. They did not adhere to the standards of care for the employee that were prescribed by the doctors. The doctors who worked in the company did not have a grasp of the laws. They prescribed medicines to the employee without proper consent of the employees. This is a major breach in violation. Owing to this, the company was facing charged. The issues of consent were not addressed by the company properly. The duty of care was not properly followed by the doctors who were in charge of treating the employee. These leads to a public backlash and fines form the government. The measures that were taken by the company were not enough.