中兰开夏大学论文代写：三重底线对企业和社会有好处吗？

中兰开夏大学论文代写：三重底线对企业和社会有好处吗？

有愤世嫉俗。当公司采取主动照顾社会和环境，人们看到他们作为公关演习。诚实地试图通过公司分享社会责任被视为一种努力，以安抚人们做什么时，他们的核心业务是破坏环境或造成社会崩溃。英美烟草（BAT）和BP，石油巨头经常面临的真诚努力超越创造机会利润尽管高射炮。

然后有问题的度量。利润可以测量，但测量环境和社会责任是具有挑战性的。经营一家公司的实际成本很难确定。很难从一个项目或政策中找到数据，这有助于我们了解一个公司的数据或政策对整体可持续发展的贡献，以及如何负责它真的是。

Slaper，Timothy F.和霍尔试图创建类似真实进步指标工具（GPI）和可持续经济福利指数（提出）测量三，使组织能够检查他们的他们在长期的基础上的决策效果的预测操作风格。

中兰开夏大学论文代写：三重底线对企业和社会有好处吗？

There is cynicism. When companies take initiatives to care for society and environment, people see them as PR exercises. Honest attempts by companies to share social responsibilities are seen as an effort to appease people by doing little when their core operations are destroying environment or causing social collapses. British American Tobacco (BAT) and BP, the petroleum giant routinely faces flak in spite of its sincere efforts to care beyond creating opportunities to profit.

Then there are problems of metrics. Profits can be measured but measuring environmental and social responsibility is challenging. The real cost of running a company is difficult to ascertain. It is difficult to find data from a project or policy that helps us understand how much contribution that data or policy of a company made towards overall sustainability; how responsible it really was.

Slaper, Timothy F. and Hall attempted to create tools like Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) and Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) to measure the three, so that the organizations are able to examine their style of operating by forecasting the effect of their decision on a long term basis.