英国爱丁堡论文代写：监管系统
英国爱丁堡论文代写：监管系统
已经推出了一个新的议程，包括决定，以形成一个全国统一的经济在该国。这些努力在最近几年一直在农委或澳洲政府理事会设置显示。2008、联邦和州致力于在州和联邦之间的新的工作安排。这个联邦财政关系委员会已经推出了新的政府间协议。这减少了交易的州和联邦政府的数量。2008、本身已经有了8的竞争改革和监管reformwhile准备全国合作27个优先领域（NP）。这一议程也导致了商业、技术、交通、基础设施、环境和计划等领域的改革。这项改革的交付还需要国家和联邦政府之间的显着的协调。
因此，国家之间的关系是非常重要的，国家之间的关系是非常重要的，运行的国民经济的无缝。监管管理实践是OECD的最佳实践是在这种情况下，由澳大利亚政府证明。
到现在已经有实质性工作监管把关处理最近完成的，包括俄Borthwick Milliner评论。监管影响分析的应用可能会波动与政治承诺，并构成严重的问题，法规的质量。自2009以来，在澳大利亚已经有超过135个不遵守或豁免的情况下，在监管过程中发生的影响声明。自律规制必须通过有效的管理整个监管系统的匹配。
从分析的主要影响，该委员会提请监管的根本原因是，在金融体系内有一个分层的监管要求。
竞争监管监督是由所有的金融市场和参与者，以确保他们是有竞争力的。
以同样的方式，监管监管将由所有的金融参与者和市场进行，以确保他们的功能效率和公平。
审慎监管规定不需要所有的金融参与者和市场。审慎监管更是家长式和侵入。同样，它可能会干扰与系统的效率、竞争力和更昂贵的。委员会选择的原则是，如果提供的财务承诺难以保持，那么机构只应受到审慎监管。
英国爱丁堡论文代写：监管系统
There had been introduced a new agenda that encompasses determinations to form a national unified economy in the country. These efforts in recent few years have been showed in setting of COAG or Council of Australian government. In 2008, the Commonwealth and State committed to new working arrangement in between State and Commonwealth. This committee on federal fiscal relations has introduced new inter-government agreement. This lessened the number of transactions to the states and federal government. In 2008, itself there have been introduced 8 competition reforms and 27 priority areas of regulatory reformwhile preparing National Partnership (NP). This agenda also leads to reform in the sector of business, technology, transport, infrastructure, environment and planning. The delivery of this reform also requires significant coordination between states and Federal Government.
Therefore it is true that the relationship between the State Federal and State is quite important to run the national economy seamless. The regulatory management practices which are among the OCED Best practices are demonstrated by the Australian Government in this scenario.
Till now there have been substantive work completed on regulatory gate keeping processing recently, including Borthwick-Milliner review of the RIA. The application of regulatory impact analysis can fluctuate with political commitment and pose serious problems to the quality of regulations. Since 2009, in Australia there have been more than 135 instances of non-compliance or exemption that have occurred during the Regulation Impact Statement Process. Disciplined regulation making must be matched through effective administrationin the whole regulatory system.
From the analysis the main implications that the Committee drew of the underlying reasons for regulation were that within the financial system there is a layering of regulation required.
• Competition regulatory oversight is required by all financial markets and participants to ensure that they are competitive.
• In the same manner, regulatory oversight is to be conducted by all financial participants and markets to ensure that they function efficiently and fairly.
• Prudential regulations are not required by all financial participants and markets. Prudential oversight is much more paternalistic and intrusive. Similarly, it couldinterfere with the efficiency and competitiveness of the system and is more costly. The rule of thumb which the committee chose was that if the financial promises offered were difficult to keep then institutions should only be subjected to prudential regulation.
