西澳大学论文代写：企业社会责任

西澳大学论文代写：企业社会责任

然而，有一些缺点，已经指出了专业人士的方法，使用的经济手段，在维持企业社会责任。有人认为，这项研究表明，外在的奖励方法可以提供短期激励的任务时，任务是不是很有挑战性和高度控制。然而在现代竞争要求更多的奉献，创造力和潜能，在这种情况下奖励方法可以导致短期思维，不道德的行为，降低自我激励，较低的性能和较少的创造性。

经济手段的缺点是，他们不是用来瞄准最重要的环境问题，但实施捎带着尊重原则的最低政治阻力（安德森，1994年）。也有人认为，胡萝卜的做法使得公司沉迷于奖励，并减少自我激励的情况下的奖励。因此，这是一个普遍的信念，只有当员工饿得够饿的时候，胡萝卜才有足够的负荷，而且足够的负荷就足够了。

例如，在使用绿色税的同时，也有一个财政倾向，以便有更多的财政收入和收入产生的收入比环境效益。如果上面提到的任何标准都没有实现，那就是说，“胡萝卜”不会为激励服务。即使激励工作与经济激励或奖励，问题仍然仍然是让企业有咬一口的奖励每现在，然后或其他公司可能会轻易DE动机。另一方面，有一个更痛苦的一部分，这种方法。因此，有人认为，胡萝卜的方法产生的贪婪的感觉，在某些情况下，动机是一个很短的时间内生活。因此，任务，需要更长的时间和更难的承诺可能无法满足的帮助下，胡萝卜的做法。

西澳大学论文代写：企业社会责任

However there have been some disadvantages that have been pointed out by professionals about the approach of using the economic instruments in sustaining the corporate social responsibility. It has been argued that the research shows that the extrinsic rewarding approach can provide short term motivational boost when the tasks are not very challenging and highly controlled. However the competition in modern times require much more dedication, creativity and potential and in such cases the rewarding approach can result in short term thinking, unethical behavior, lowered self motivation, lower performance and less creativity.

The disadvantage with the economic instruments is that they are not used to aim at the most important environmental problems, but are implemented incidentally with respect to the principle of the lowest political resistance (Andersen, 1994). It has also been argued that the carrot approach makes the companies addicted to the rewards and diminishes the self motivation in the absence of the rewards. Hence it is a common belief that the carrot approach works only when the employee is hungry enough, the carrot is sweet enough and the load is light enough.

For example, there is a also a financial inclination in the use of green taxes so that there is more focus on the financial profit and revenue generated than on environmental effectiveness. If any of the above mentioned criteria is not fulfilled, it is said that the carrot will not serve the incentive. Even if the motivated has worked with the economic incentives or the reward, the question still remains of letting the corporate have a bite of the reward every now and then or else the companies might get easily de-motivated. On the other hand there is one more bitter part of this approach. Hence it is argued that the carrot approach produces a feeling of greed and in some cases the motivation lives for a very short period of time. Hence the tasks that need longer and harder commitments might not be fulfilled with the help of the carrot approach.