文章

美国代写作业:现实主义捕捉当代国际关系的本质

美国代写作业:现实主义捕捉当代国际关系的本质

本文将着重于批判性地评估现实主义是否准确捕捉当代国际关系所持有的本质。接下来是对现实主义理论的简要描述,两者之间的关键关系将被详细讨论并涵盖不同的概念,同时提供准确的例子。
现实主义
现实主义不能被认为是由命题和假设的明确组合所定义的理论。相反,正如一些评论员所指出的,已知它是一种基本的方向,据此它被称为哲学的处置。这描述了它是有助于塑造理论的规范性焦点的组合。现实主义被称为理解国际关系的方法,其出现通过几个分析家的贡献逐渐发生(Borger,2012)。
有一些美国研究人员,如亚历山大·汉密尔顿,从现实主义的角度考虑国际关系。现实主义被称为集中于四个主要命题的传统相关的国际理论。
第一个提议是,国际制度属于无政府主义的性质。基于这个主张,已经表明除了具有调节其相互作用的能力的状态之外没有其他的表演者(Cozette,2008)。在持续的无政府状态或敌对状态下存在着国际制度。第二个建议是,国家应被视为更重要的表演者。第三个主张是,国际体系中的每一个国家都是理性的和单一的行动者。基于这个命题,可以说,国家拥有说服自利的倾向。未来,各组织力求获得尽可能多的资源(El-Khawas,2011)。第四个主张是每个国家的关键问题是生存。基于这一主张,可以说,各国致力于建立军事部门和军队的生存,可能导致安全的困境。

美国代写作业:现实主义捕捉当代国际关系的本质

This essay will focus on critically assessing if realism is accurate in capturing the nature held by the contemporary international relations. Followed by a brief description on the theory of realism, the key relationship between the two will be discussed in detail and covering different concepts, while providing accurate examples for the same.
Realism
Realism cannot be considered as a theory being defined by the explicit combination of propositions and assumptions. Instead, as it has been noted by a number of commentators, it is known to be a basic orientation, according to which it has been termed as a disposition of philosophy. This depicts that it is a combination of normative focus that helps in shaping the theory. Realism is referred to as an approach made for understanding international relations, the emergence of which took place gradually by the contributions of several analysts (Borger, 2012).
There have been a number of American researchers, like Alexander Hamilton, who considered international relations from the perspective of realism. Realism is referred to as a tradition related international theory centralizing upon four main propositions.
The first proposition is that the international system falls under the nature of anarchic. Based on this proposition, it has been stated that there is no other performer apart from the states having the capability to regulate their interactions (Cozette, 2008). There is an existence of international system in a condition of constant anarchy or antagonism. The second proposition is that the states should be considered as more important performers. The third proposition is that each and every state in the international system is rational and unitary actors. Based on this proposition, it can be stated that the states hold the tendency of persuading self- interest. Further ahead, groups strive on attaining the maximum possible resources (El-Khawas, 2011). The fourth proposition is that the key concern of each and every state is survival. Based on this proposition, it can be stated that states put in efforts to build military departments and armies for their survival that may result in a dilemma of security.