商科代写：内部合同制度

商科代写：内部合同制度

工业革命不仅标志着劳动和工业的大规模专业化，而且标志着主要由劳动管理关系处理方式组成的管理活动的大规模专业化。内部合同制度类似于外包制度，也坚持资本主义工资与工人工资的差别。但这并不相同，因为内部合同制度是后来工厂制度的核心要素。契约制度内部的主要问题是知识所有权与资本所有权之间的矛盾，以及二者之间的冲突。资本家拥有资本，而不是知识，因此与工匠签订契约，依靠他们，而工匠由于缺乏资本而无法拥有产品。因此，这就导致了利益主体和产品所有权的冲突。为了更好和持续的生存，资本家可能不得不接受工人的重要性的上升，因为他们拥有知识，因为资本家不能投资于失败的企业或那些没有知识工人生产高质量产品的企业。

商科代写：内部合同制度
合同制度内部的规划是关于工人规划而不是资本规划，因为没有知识的所有权和资本没有权威和价值，而工匠知识传播的规划是制度的核心部分。随着时间的推移，知识的积累可能会使其变得有价值，如果它能长期持续下去，直到支持和外部市场和基础设施的发展，那么它就可以成为合作资本。资本家比工匠的不断追求,让他们依赖与他们拥有知识的获得,因为工匠无法谈判进展仅仅拥有知识当他们缺乏资本履行最低限度零售市场的必要性。

商科代写：内部合同制度

Industrial revolution was marked not just by the mass specialisation of labours and industry, but also by the mass specialisation of managerial activities primarily consisting of the way labour management relationships were handled. The inside contract system was similar to the putting-out system, which also persisted on the difference between the capitalist pay and the worker wages. But it was not identical since the inside contract system was the central element in the later factory system. The prime issue in the inside contract system was the tension between the ownership of knowledge and capital, and a constant conflict between the two. The capitalist owned capital, but not knowledge and therefore contracted to craftsmen and relied on them and the craftsmen could not own the products due to their lack of capital. Thus, it is leading to a conflict over the ownership of the major part of the profits and product ownership. For better and consistent survival, the capitalists could have had to accept the rise of the workers importance due to their possession of knowledge, because capitalists could not invest into failed ventures or on those, where there were no knowledgeable workers producing quality products.

商科代写：内部合同制度
The planning in inside contract system was about worker planning and not capital planning, because ownership and capital without knowledge had not authority and value, and craftsmen planning of knowledge dissemination were the central part of the system. With time, the possession of knowledge could have made it worthwhile and could have partnered capital had it persisted for a longer period of time until the development of supporting and external markets and infrastructures. The incessant quest of capitalists to overpower the craftsmen and make them dependent with their possession of knowledge was gaining grounds, because the craftsmen were not able to negotiate their progress on merely the possession of knowledge when they lacked capital to fulfil the bare minimum necessity from the retail market.