paper代写：经济竞争
paper代写：经济竞争
可以明显地认为，不应强调与发现程序的竞争。在强调这一点的情况下，可以立即得出不可能如此明显的结论。竞争的第一重要之处在于其不可预测的结果，它完全不同于任何人为之努力的结果。此外，这些有益影响的表现是在一些期望落空和某些意图受挫的情况下进行的。关于方法，第二个结论与第一个结论有密切的联系。宏观经济理论在过去二三十年中失去了相当大的声誉的原因仍然是一个问题(哈伯格1954)。所涉及的宏观经济理论是对经济结构的细枝大节和分析，只能说明对竞争作用的认识。与竞争相关的必然结果的原因是该理论与竞争相关的有效性无法通过相关案例的实验来验证。这个理论可以通过人们基于先入为主理论的模型来验证。
paper代写：经济竞争
在这种情况下，实验的结果将没有什么意义，这就提出了这样一个问题:进行实验的成本是否值得。然而，当事实是未知的提前，这些事实的发现可以从竞争中获得。它也不能确定竞争的方式，有效地导致相关情况下可能已经发现的东西的发现。以实验的形式进行的核查包括利用竞争来实现这一结果的社会，其程度大于其他社会所作的努力。这种竞争的优点是无法通过经验来验证的，而这些优点恰恰是发现过程与一般科学相关的利益共享的情况。科学的成功程序与经济竞争的不同之处在于，经济竞争带有一种发现时间和具体情况的方法论，当科学发现事件的不规律性时，可以称之为一般事实。科学关注的是那些在证实或驳斥其理论的程度上是独特的具体事实。
paper代写：经济竞争
It can be considered as obvious that involving competition with the procedure of discovery should not be emphasized. In the case of emphasizing of this, the conclusion is obtained immediately that cannot be so obvious. The first importance of the competition lies with its unpredictable outcome and is wholly different from what anyone would have been consciously trying for. Moreover, the manifestation of the helpful effects has been carried out with disappointment of some expectations and certain intentions have been frustrated. There is close association of the second conclusion with the first conclusion with respect to the methodology. The question remains as to the reason why macro-economic theory lost considerable reputation in last twenty to thirty years (Harberger 1954). The macroeconomic theory in question is the structure of the economy’s fine details and analysis that can alone show the understanding related to the role of competition. The reason of the necessary consequence related to competition is the fact that the theory’s validity in relation to the competition cannot be verified with experiment for the cases of interest. The theory can be verified by the people on models based on preconceived theories.
paper代写：经济竞争
Under such circumstances, the experiment’s outcome will have little interest, raising the question whether it would be worth the cost to conduct it. However, when the facts are unknown in advance, the discovery of those facts can be obtained from the competition. It also cannot be ascertained the way the competition, effectively lead to the relevant circumstances’ discovery with regards to what might have been discovered. The verification in the form experimenting consists of the societies that take up the usage of competition in realizing this outcome at an extent that is greater than what has been done by the others. The competition’s merits that cannot be verified empirically are exactly those cases where the discovery procedures shares the interests related to the science in general. The difference existing between the science’s successful procedure and the economic competition is that the economic competition carries a methodology to discover temporaries and specific circumstances, where as the science discovers the events’ irregularities, which can be described as general facts. The concern of the science is with specific facts that are unique to the extent that they confirm or refute its theories.
