論文修改價錢：Euthyphro困境的解释

論文修改價錢：Euthyphro困境的解释

这篇文章的目的是回答关于Euthyphro的困境和神圣命令理论的一系列问题。讨论还体现了强大和弱的神命令理论的不同，以及对Euthyphro的困境解释最合理的理论。神圣的命令理论认为我们所遵循的道德伦理实际上是源于对上帝的命令的直接服从。神的命令理论认为上帝是道德规则和约束的起源的焦点。在任何情况下，道德上的权利是上帝为我们所做的。

論文修改價錢：Euthyphro困境的解释

道德依赖于上帝并假定它，任何其他的智慧都是错误的根据神的命令理论。这是一个既批判又被许多哲学家强烈支持的理论。当人们似乎放弃上帝的时候，宗教、上帝和伦理之间可能的联系似乎并不正确(Anscombe, 1958)。然而，Donagan(1977)指出，尽管接受道德是一种美德，而不是作为一种法律，人们仍然认为神圣的戒律观点必须包括在内。

論文修改價錢：Euthyphro困境的解释

The purpose of this essay is to answer a series of questions on Euthyphro’s Dilemma and the Divine Command Theory. The discussion also presents the difference in the strong and weak divine command theory and the theory that is the most plausible as an explanation for the Euthyphro’s dilemma. The divine command theory states that the moral ethics that we follow are actually derived from direct obedience to the commands of God. The divine command theory hence observes God as the focal point for the origination of moral rules and constraints. What is morally right in any given situation is what God has set out for us to do.

論文修改價錢：Euthyphro困境的解释
Morality is dependent on God and to presume it, any other wise is false according to the divine command theory. This is a theory that has both been critiqued and has been supported strongly by many philosophers. A possible connection between religion or God and ethics when people have seemingly given up on God does not seem right (Anscombe, 1958). However, Donagan (1977) states that although accepting the morality as a virtue and not as a law, people still contend that the divine commandment standpoint has to be included.