论文代写:设施布局的建议

论文代写:设施布局的建议

与细胞工厂相比,过程工厂可以说是更加严格,因为它强加了过程框架(Askin等,1993)。然而并不是所有的流程流,这可能引入的复杂性水平的流动系统,将降低效率。然而使用细胞工厂更容易仍有刚性的过程中细胞,但细胞可能在总流量结构重新排列按需求。库存管理在所有阶段都将高的工艺流程布局(Ngampak,2011)。这可能会导致该公司的问题。布局被推荐的公司是一个新公司。会有最初的启动成本和更多的参与,在流程布局的情况下,被认为是高库存管理成本。另一方面使用蜂窝布局模型,库存管理成本降低(布兰登,1996)。人力资源培训成本也降低。有限的培训,以确保工作的细胞是绰绰有余。顶级装配将只需要在集成和低层次的细节也可以利用更少的熟练工人。这将有助于减少工人补偿基于技能和将使竞争(Swamdimass等,2000)。

论文代写:设施布局的建议

In comparison with the cellular manufactory, process manufactory can be said to be more rigid as it imposes the process framework (Askin, et al, 1993). However not all processes flow in order, this could introduce a level of complexity in the flow of the system that will reduce efficiency. However using cellular manufactory it is easier as there is still rigidity of process in the cell, but cells themselves may be rearranged in the total flow structure as per needs. Inventory management at all stages will be high in the case of process flow layouts (Ngampak, 2011). This can cause an issue for the company. The company for which the layout is being recommended is a newer company. There will be initial start up costs and more involved, in the case of the process layout it is seen that there is high inventory management costs involved. On the other hand using the cellular layout model inventory management costs are reduced (Brandon, 1996).  Manpower training costs are also reduced. Limited amount of training to ensure working of the cells is more than enough. Top level assembly will only be needed during integration and the lower level details can make use of less skilled workers too. This will help reduce worker compensation based on skills and will make competitive (Swamdimass et al, 2000).