論文代寫行情-GRI的G4可持續發展指標。根據GRI的關鍵指標，如G4可持續發展和治理指標，有必要改善經濟實踐，如采購和市場存在(Farnetti, 2014)。報告中並非如此。在SIA的可持續發展報告中，我們看到了環境方面的細節，經濟方面只占了環境方面的一小部分。現在，根據G4的指導方針，環境方面包括水的使用、排放控制、廢水、交通等(Fonesca, 2014;Vigneau等人，2015)。這些都得到了充分的展示。在社會實踐方面，G4的指導方針再次提出了四個子類別，即勞動實踐、人權、社會和產品責任。勞動實踐是利益相關者參與的一部分。接下來論文代寫行情-GRI的G4可持續發展指標分享給留學生閱讀。
According to GRI key indicators such as the G4 sustainability and governance indicators, it is necessary to improve economic practices, such as procurement and market presence (Farnetti, 2014). This is not the case in the report. In the sustainability reports of SIA, it is seen that the environmental aspects are presented in detail and economic aspects only take a small portion under the environmental aspects. Now Environmental aspects according in to G4 guidelines cover from water use, emissions control, effluents, transportation and more (Fonesca, 2014; Vigneau, et al., 2015). These are presented quite adequately. In terms of social practices, the G4 guidelines state four more sub categories again which are that of labour practices, human rights, society and product responsibility. Labour practices are discussed as part of stakeholder engagement. Labour management relations, occupational safety and health and more are presented here. In terms of labour disclosure practices, some of the company’s actual practices are presented. Human rights issues such as that of humanitarian aids and more are discussed. Societal practices with respect to sustainability, such as SIA’s motives against corruption or others practices are not that clearly defined, however, corruption is presented as one of the parts under corporate governance. The standpoint against corruption outside the company is not discussed. SIA is an airline that operates internationally and hence has discussed cultural elements, but again this is not discussed in detail.
Now the work of Andersson and Jabowksi (2013) argued that the sustainabilityinitiatives as presented in the reports and website of SIA present social conditions or social sustainability issues as disconnected or removed from their environmental contributions. Now this research work was done in 2013, and the current sustainability reports chosen are from 2015 and 2016 fiscal year respectively. In more current analysis, there are areas where social and environmental contributions are discussed in a collaborative way. Hence, Andersson & Jabowski’s argument could now be considered in context of these discussions. However, more amount of collaboration would have been helpful. The TBL, the cooperative frameworks and more are based on collaborations. Similarly, Andersson & Jabowski (2013) present that in comparison with different airline groups it is presented in existing research that SIA does not present the stakeholder involvement as much. However, in the current 2016 report, the stakeholder involvement, as in stakeholder engagement and impact is presented in more detail. Similarly, in terms of emissions, CO2 and NOx emissions are covered, in the past it was argued that SIA had only covered for CO2 emissions in its reports (Heeres et al., 2011).