论文代写：澳洲婚姻法

论文代写：澳洲婚姻法

约翰和珍妮最近结婚了，因为婚姻本身就是两个人的合法合同。关于婚姻的一般法律规定：“在本合同在法院合法的国家，男女之间的婚姻是合法的”。
澳大利亚的婚姻由“1961年婚姻法”的以下条款定义，在2004年“婚姻法”修正案之后：婚姻是指一个男人和一个女人联合起来，排除所有其他人，自愿终身。某些工会不是婚姻。在外国建立的联盟：（a）一个男人和另一个男人;或（b）一名妇女和另一名妇女;在澳大利亚不得承认为婚姻。
这个案件突出了约翰和珍妮在结婚后和结婚后不久遇到的两个独特的问题。以下部分将突出发生的国家的法律问题，并核实主管当局和关于预期结果的建议。
案例一：约翰最好的西装已经被干洗店宠坏了。
问题：丹，干洗店事先通知约翰，因为干洗可能对他的西服造成损害。尽管约翰已经同意这个口头报价，但丹让他签了一份合同，声明干洗店不会对你的衣服发生任何损坏负责。约翰甚至没有通过它签订合同由于干洗西服完全磨损。
规则：案件有两个法律问题。第一个是干洗店已经口头陈述了可能对服装造成的损害，因此John对干洗店所描述的可接受的损害点了点头。第二个问题是对服装造成的损害大于已经提到的损失。如上所述，西装已经完全毁了。

论文代写：澳洲婚姻法

John and Jenny have recently got married, as marriage is itself a legal contract between two individual. The general law about marriages states: “Marriages between a man and a woman is legal in the country where contracted shall be held legal in the courts of this State”
Marriage in Australia is defined by the following clause of Marriage Act 1961, after the amendment of Marriage Act of 2004: Marriage means the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life. Certain unions are not marriages. A union solemnized in a foreign country between: (a) a man and another man; or (b) a woman and another woman; must not be recognized as a marriage in Australia.
The case has outlaid two distinctive problems that John and Jenny has faced during and soon after their marriage. Following section will highlight the legal issues of the incurred states and verify the responsible authority and the recommendation about the desired outcome.
Case a: John’s best suit has been spoiled by the drycleaner.
Issue: Dan, the drycleaner has informed John beforehand about the damage that could be caused to his suit because of dry cleaning. Even though John has agreed to this verbal offer and Dan made him sign a contract which declares that drycleaner would not be responsible for any sort of damage happened to your clothing’s. John signed the contract without even going through it As a result of dry cleaning the suit wore off completely.
Rule: There are two legal issues with the case; first one is the drycleaner has verbally stated about the damage that can be caused to the suit, therefore John has nodded on the acceptable damage as described by the drycleaner.The second issue is the damage that has been caused to the suit is greater than the loss that has been mentioned. As mentioned in the case, the suit has been completely ruined.