怀卡托理工学院论文代写：商业环境:关于三星的报告

怀卡托理工学院论文代写：商业环境:关于三星的报告

完成由政府政策框架,促进市场竞争。这将提高客户满意度。竞争政策的目的是使可用增加消费者的选择,促进技术创新和有效的价格竞争效率的市场(沃伊特)。

监管机制是用来保证业务活动没有对其他资源的间接的负面影响。的例子之一受雇于政府监管机制引入清洁发展机制(CDM),以确保企业活动不影响环境。同样的澳大利亚政府推出了碳税(BERR,2008)。

竞争政策对三星产生重大影响。当然是有利于提高客户的满意度,因为它减少了由于价格竞争加剧,同时产品的成本与开发质量必须提高或持续增加,同时其他成本因素也增加了。当然竞争也会导致更高的生产率。

考虑到监管机制,可以说,监管框架可以有更多的负面影响。然而研究表明,监管机制引进产品市场改革将积极与生产率增长而言,降低行政成本,增长对技术负面影响的变化。三星一直受益的监管改革的技术变化的支持。洛艾萨等(2005)的研究,强调监管机制与增长负相关。

怀卡托理工学院论文代写：商业环境:关于三星的报告

The completion policy is framed by the government to promote competition in the market. This will enhance the customer satisfaction. The aim of the competition policy is to make available increased choices to consumers, promoting efficiency by technological innovation and effective price competition in the market (Voigt).

The regulatory mechanism is employed to ensure the business activities do not have indirect negative impact on other resources. One of the examples of regulatory mechanism employed by the government is introduction of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to ensure that the businesses activities do not impact the environment. Similarly the Australian government has introduced Carbon Tax (BERR, 2008).

The competition policy has significant impact on Samsung. Certainly it is beneficial in improving the customer satisfaction as it reduces the price due to increased competition and at the same time the cost related to development of the product has increased as quality has to be improved or sustained and at the same time other cost factors have also increased. Certainly the competition also leads to higher productivity.

Considering the regulatory mechanism, it can be said that regulation that is framed can have more of negative impact. However studies have shown that the regulatory mechanism bringing in product market reforms are correlated positively with productivity growth in terms of reducing the administrative cost while negatively impacting the growth with respect to technological changes. Samsung has been benefitted as a result of regulatory reforms as the technological changes have been supported. The study conducted by Loayza et al (2005), highlights that regulatory mechanism has been negatively associated with growth.