个人陈述代写:图片展示中的议程

个人陈述代写:图片展示中的议程

作者正在进行许多学术和公共辩论。首先，作者提出了如何将图像作为加拿大身份的标记。这些图片是加拿大、农田、农业区、旅游区等景观。所有这些领域都被视为身份和文化的象征。这可以理解为使公民在国内保护自然资源。作者使用了一个示例文档，类似于公共服务公告PSA。在沙滩上享受日光浴的人们的形象与沙漠地区平行。这些陈述的存在是为了提倡人们必须开始使用土地，并以一种更好的保护方式来照顾它。然而，土地被认为是一种资产，一种经济实力，这是在工作中反复恢复的。WJT Mitchell认为土地是身份形成的焦点，这一论断被带入了讨论的前沿，尤其是在土地和文化相互联系的方式上。

个人陈述代写:图片展示中的议程
然而，即使在这一表述中，作者也批评说，这只是为了展示一种对边缘群体的家长式作风。从经济角度衡量，土地的真正价值只是等式的一端。在土地被称为礼物的地方，它会继续显示它对观察者有多重价值。当一个图像表示被赋予时，它通常被认为是代表地理位置及其问题的一种真实的方式。作者参与的另一个想法是在一个纪录片的视角下的权威。作者认为，纪录片的观点几乎总是被认为是正确的。然而，情况并非总是如此。对这样的图像表示进行批评是必要的。他们也不一定总是正确的。现在在提出这一观点时，可以说作者是在对媒体和其他形式的信息提要进行批评话语分析的观点。

个人陈述代写:图片展示中的议程

The author is engaging with many scholarly and public debates. Firstly, the author presents how images are being produced to serve as markers of Canadian identity. These images are landscapes of Canada, the farmlands, agricultural areas, tourist areas and more. All of these areas are seen to be representations of identity and culture. This could be understood in terms of engaging the citizens to conserve natural resources within the country. The author makes use of an example document, something like a public service announcement PSA. Images of people enjoying in beaches is represented in parallel to desert lands. The representations exist to advocate that people have to start using the land and caring for it in a way that enables better conservation. However, land is considered more of an asset, an economic strength and this is repeatedly reinstated in the work. WJT Mitchell’s assertion that land is a focal point for formation of identity is brought into the forefront of discussion, especially in the ways that land and culture is connected.

个人陈述代写:图片展示中的议程
However, even in this representation, the author critiques that it is only done to showcase a paternalistic attitude towards marginalized groups. Land’s true value measured in economic terms is just one end of the equation. Where land is called as a gift, it goes on to show that it has multiple values for the beholder. When an image representation is given, it is more often considered to be an authentic way to represent the geographic locations and its issues etc. Another idea the author engages in is that of authority in the case of a documentary viewpoint. The author argues that a documentary viewpoint is almost always accepted as being right. However, this need not always is the case. It is necessary to be critical of such image representations. They need not be always true either. Now in presenting this viewpoint, it could be said that the author is contributing to ideas of critical discourse analysis in media and other forms of information feeds.