代写论文：法律和艺术——案例分析

代写论文：法律和艺术——案例分析

根据美国版权法1节8条是由1976年的联邦版权法,它给的权利保护的自然对象的艺术和文化的人得到碎片在版权局注册。

在这种情况下,没有版权的音乐部分。这些作品是出版虽然只是艺术总监的名字和她的教授。裸露的乐谱,存在只有作曲家的名字之前,“通过”。通过这次盛会,艺术总监也解决她的个人仇恨负担得起的卫生保健法案奥巴马政府发起的。她打算用这些歌曲之一当然歌词改为谴责它。

根据美国版权法1976节,艺术总监一定能继续改变这首歌的歌词,因为她的欲望。这首歌不是在版权局注册首先所以它不应该是一个问题。如果她想修改歌词,她还可以,但只要这首歌是要注册,诚心诚意地教授的名字也应该相同。信贷应该去双方即使一方死亡。

代写论文：法律和艺术——案例分析

According to article 1 section 8 of the US copyright law which is governed by the Federal Copyright Act of 1976, it gives the right of preserving the natural objects of art and culture to the people who get the pieces registered with the copyright office.

Here in this case, the music pieces were not copyrighted in the first place. Those works were published though but just with the names of the artistic director and her professor. The bare sheet music which exists just has the name of the composer preceded by ‘By’. Through this gala event, the artistic director is also addressing her personal hatred against the affordable health care act launched by the Obama administration. She plans to use one of those songs of course with changed lyrics to condemn it.

According to section 8 of the US copyright act of 1976, the artistic director can surely go ahead and change the lyrics of the song as she desires.The song is not registered with the copyright office in the first place so it should not be an issue. Also if she wants to modify the lyrics she can but whenever the song is going to get registered, in good faith the professor’s name should also be present with the same. The credit should go to both the parties even though one of the parties is deceased.