代寫essay：薄伽丘對《十日談》的部分觀點
代寫essay：薄伽丘對《十日談》的部分觀點
但丁的文本對於理解《十日談》中對浪漫的處理提供了一個重要的框架(本森3)。這種傾向有助於確定保羅和弗朗西斯卡命運背後的悲劇。薄伽丘試圖轉移讀者的負擔。在浪漫主題中，慾望是推動主人公主動行動的關鍵。按照薄伽丘的觀點，讀者應該按照他們所期望的方式做出反應。當你用心閱讀時，你會被誘惑去模仿但丁的主人公，並傾向於根據個人的慾望行事。當伽羅托被認為是《十日論》的副標題時，薄伽丘諷刺地做了同樣的事(本-阿莫斯429)。任何著名的浪漫小說都可以選，但他選的是亞瑟王被桂尼維爾和蘭斯洛特背叛的故事。伽羅托反映了代表一個具有像徵意義的謹慎故事的力量，薄伽丘對這個標題的看法是籠統的。這似乎代表了愛的全部主題。從這個角度來看，薄伽丘承認《十日談》展現了一個充滿人物和情境潛力的愛情主題。
其中一些是負面的，而另一些是正面的。值得注意的是，不能因為模仿任何可疑行為而將主題誤解為小說。根據這個副標題，薄伽丘將愛呈現為一個文本的潘達路(富蘭克林19)。因此，薄伽丘敦促讀者在整部小說中對個人的反應負責，而不是將其視為犯罪。這本小說鼓勵讀者把故事理解為故事或小說。愛的選擇在整個列表中明顯缺失。由於薄伽丘在很多方面都代表了愛，所以省略具有特殊的意義。它是一種有缺陷的形式，需要彌補英雄人物不可避免的弱點。在卡蘭德里諾的愛情中，它們進一步充當了相思、心痛和疾病的傳播者。因此，這部小說也反對以愛情為主題，創作了大量帶有浪漫元素的故事(Smarr 13)。在整部小說中，薄伽丘指出，小說的內容是為了糾正由愛情主題所呈現的幾個敘事問題而產生的。薄伽丘進一步承認，沒有舊形式，就不可能有新形式的存在。
代寫essay：薄伽丘對《十日談》的部分觀點
The texts of Dante were crucial in providing a significant framework to understand the treatment of romance in Decameron (Benson 3). The overall tendency of love is highlighted for lingering the work among readers. This tendency helps in determining the tragedy behind the fate of Paolo and Francesca. Boccaccio seeks on shifting the burden imposed over the readers. In the theme of romance, desire is crucial in driving protagonist for initiating actions. As per the view of Boccaccio, readers should be reacting as per the desired ways. While reading them diligently, one is tempted for imitating the protagonist of Dante and tends to act upon the desires individually. When Galeotto is considered as the subtitle of Decameron, Boccaccio does the same ironically (Ben-Amos 429). Any famous romantic title could have been selected, but he selected the story in which King Arthur is betrayed by Guinevere and Lancelot. Galeotto reflected the power of representing an emblematic tale of caution, and Boccaccio considered the title generically. This appears to be representing the complete theme of love. From this perspective, Boccaccio allows to acknowledge that Decameron presents a love theme with the full potentiality of characters and situations.
Some of these appear to be negative while other is positive. It is a major caution that theme must not be misinterpreted as fiction for imitating any doubtful behaviour. As per this subtitle, Boccaccio has presented love as a textual Pandarus (Franklin 19). Thus, Boccaccio urges to take responsibility of individual reactions in the entire novel instead of considering them for transgressing. Readers are urged in this novel for interpreting the tales as stories or a novel. The option of love has conspicuous absence in the entire list. There is specific significance of omission as Boccaccio has represented love in a number of ways. It is a defective form requiring remedy with inevitable vulnerability of heroic characters. They further act as purveyor of lovesickness, heartache, and illness in the love of Calandrino. Therefore, the novel also is opposing the theme of love producing stories with elements of romance in abundance (Smarr 13). In the entire novel, Boccaccio states that the content is outcome of the need for correcting several narrative issues presented by the theme of love. It has been further acknowledged by Boccaccio that the existence of new form is not possible in the absence of old forms.
