对价是合同有效的一个非常重要的条件。assignment代写在Beaton v McDevitt7一案中，Beaton对被告转让财产的承诺提供了对价。在这个案例中发生的问题是比顿的考虑是否有价值。assignment代写经仔细分析，法院宣布这种考虑实际上是有价值的。
建立法律关系的意向是关于合同效力的另一个重要要求。人们发现，由于合同的存在，合同当事人必须准备好建立法律关系。assignment代写在大多数情况下，考虑的结果是提供这方面的证据。在Rose and Frank & Co诉Crompton9案中，Rose和Frank开始与申诉人就提供卫生纸达成协议。法院认为，他们的协议明确包括他们没有订立法律合同的任何意图。从此以后，他们之间就没有订立任何有效的合同。选定的举行活动的地区被认为是高度复杂的，因为在该地区已观察到一些法定发展。assignment代写最后，有关有效合同的一项主要要求是是否有正式手续。作为一般的法律规则，合同不需要遵守各种形式。证明口头合同是一项困难的任务;然而，书面协议的形式并不影响合同的效力。
The Australian Contract Law ensures the validity of a contract that takes place between two or more parties. For contract to be in effect, agreement between the parties is important. An offer is made by a party which is accepted by another party thus forming a valid contract. Consideration is also another important point in contract that has been defined as the price that the promisor asks as an exchange for the promise made.assignment代写 Consideration is a highly important requirement for the validity of a contract. It has been held in the case of Beaton v McDevitt7 that a consideration was provided by Beaton for the promise made by the respondent to transfer the property. The issue that occurred in this case was whether the consideration made by Beaton was valuable or not. The court of law upon careful analysis declared that the consideration was in fact valuable.
The intention for the creation of legal relations is another important requirement with respect to the validity of a contract. It has been found that for the existence of a contract, it is highly imperative for the parties involved in the contract to be ready for the creation of legal relations. In most of the cases, consideration results in the provision of evidence in this regard. In the case of Rose and Frank & Co v Crompton9, assignment代写Rose and Frank began9 an agreement with the complainants with respect to the provision of tissue paper. It was held by the court of law that their agreement clearly included that they did not have any intention of entering into a legal contract. Henceforth, this led to the conclusion that no valid contract was formed between them. The selected area for event is considered to be highly complex as a number of statutory developments have been observed in this area. Lastly, a major requirement with respect to a valid contract is the presence or absence of formalities. As a general rule of law, contracts are not required to comply with various types of formalities11. Proving contracts that are oral is considered to be a difficult task; however, the formality with respect to the presence of a written agreement does not have any effect on the validity of a contract.