澳洲作業代寫：物質文化的符號價值
澳洲作業代寫：物質文化的符號價值
Crane和Bovone(第319頁)分析了文本的符號價值及其對物質文化的依戀，與物質文化相關的符號價值的傳播及其對消費者的傳播，以及消費者對物質文化的符號價值歸屬。作者註意到，附加的符號和意義歸屬是為了吸引更多購買者的興趣和慾望，而不是為了識別特定的物質或非物質文化。時尚社會學與消費社會學有著直接的聯繫，因為它定義了社會功能的本質以及消費者表達購買慾望的方式。作者指出，社會學家在達成普遍價值方面缺乏共識，而普遍價值首先是人類的功能，其次是關於物質對象的功能。這裡出現的問題是，人們將某種意義歸因於物質文化的動機，以及這種行為背後的實際潛在原因。當社會學家發現這種動機的原因時，就可以研究和確定歸因的過程和人的意義的變化，從而清楚地表明人們對物質文化的歸因。
Kac(第1頁)帶來了一個關於事物的新視角，即克隆、生物技術主導的發明，以及人類的內部器官，如基因，能夠按照自己的意願進行轉移和利用。生物技術主導的發明經歷了前所未有的增長和藝術的可能性，當基因加工食品和物品被出售給社會，表明了一種藝術依戀的過程，把基因元素歸因於慾望的產品和人們所追求的東西。然而，這可能產生對生命的物化，以及對主體和人類的漠視。因此，它不僅給新形成的具有遺傳傾向的物質文化帶來了更多的賦予價值的可能性，而且也帶來了更多貶低人類生命重要性的可能性，以及它如何破壞人類固有價值的可能性。作者談到了身體的最微小的成分可能通過選擇性染色體、選擇性基因等外化。這篇文章並沒有為大肆宣傳的技術進步提供解決方案，因為技術進步會破壞人類的無形價值。這必將使人類的存在商品化，人類的存在也有可能被交易。
澳洲作業代寫：物質文化的符號價值
Crane and Bovone (pg. 319) analyse the symbolic value of texts and their attachment to the material culture, the communication of the symbolic values associated with the material culture and its dissemination to consumers, and the consumers’ attribution of symbolic values to material culture. The authors’ note that the symbols and the attribution of meaning attached is targeted to attract more interest and desire from purchasers and not to identify a particular material or an immaterial culture. The sociology of fashion is directly linked with the sociology of consumption as it defines the very nature of societal functioning and the way consumers make known their desires of acquisitions. The authors point out the lack of sociologists to identify a consensus in reaching a universal value, which is a function of humans first and then about material objects. The question arises here about the motivation of people to attribute a meaning to the material culture and the actual underlying reason behind such actions. When sociologists will identify the reason for such motivation, the process of attribution and the changing meaning of people can be studied and identified giving clear indications of peoples’ attribution to material cultures.
Kac (pg. 1) brings in a new perspective about things and that is of the clones, the biotechnology led inventions and the internal organs of humans such as genes as being able to transfer and get utilised according to one’s wish. The biotechnology led inventions has experienced unprecedented growth and possibilities for art when genetically processed foods, and stuff is sold to society indicating an artistic attachment to the process of attributing genetic elements to the product of desires and what is being sought for by people. This however can generate possibilities of objectification of lives and a disregard of subjects and humans. Therefore as much as it brings more possibilities of attributing value to the new formed genetically inclined material culture, it also brings in more possibilities of degrading the importance of human life and how it ruins the very inherent value of humans. The author speaks about the minutest ingredients of the body being possible to externalise with selective chromosomes, selective genes, etc. The article has not provided solutions to the much hyped about advancement of technology which will destroy the intangible value of humans. This is bound to commodify the very existence of humans and their existence would be possibly traded.
