澳洲雪梨大学论文代写:合同法
澳洲雪梨大学论文代写:合同法
相互之间的错误是合同条款模糊不清。莱佛士诉Wishcelhaus案（1864年）159 ER 375是一个相互错误发生的例子。单方面的错误是一方当事人错误地违反了合同另一部分的某些方面。在这些情况下，发生错误的一方应该向另一方提供补救或损害赔偿。 Taylor v Johnson（1983）151 CLR 422的案例被认为是单方面错误案例的常见例子。
最后，当对方犯错而不是自己的错误时，也会出现非最初的问题（这不是我的行为）。 Petelin v Cullen（1975）132 CLR 355的案例就是这些错误的一个例子。
澳洲雪梨大学论文代写:合同法
胁迫
合同法第50条探讨了胁迫。 Crescendo管理私人有限公司诉Westpac银行公司诉（1988）19 NSWLR 40,45-6案例解释了法院如何审理胁迫案件。 “Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104”的案例解释了当事人如何受到威胁要签订合同。因此，如果合同是在胁迫下形成的，则合同条款不适用。这是一个复杂的因素，需要根据具体情况加以解决。
不当影响.这发生在缔约方之间发生权力不平等时。在这些情况下，并非所有交易都会导致补救。过度的影响力进一步分解为表达不当影响并推定不当影响（Andrews，2015）。
澳洲雪梨大学论文代写:合同法
A mutual mistake is when the terms of the contract are nebulous. The case of Raffles v Wishcelhaus (1864) 159 ER 375 is an example of how mutual mistakes occur. Unilateral mistake is when one of the parties mistakes some aspect of the other part of the contract. In these cases, the party that made a mistake is supposed to provide the other party with remedies or damages. The case of Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 is considered to be the common example for the cases for unilateral mistakes.
Finally, the issue of Non est factum (it is not my deed) also occurs when the other party makes the mistake through no fault of their own. The case of Petelin v Cullen (1975) 132 CLR 355 is an example of these mistakes.
澳洲雪梨大学论文代写:合同法
Duress
Duress is explored in Section 50 of the Contract law. The case of Crescendo Management Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 19 NSWLR 40, 45–6 explains how the courts consider the case for duress. The case of “Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104” explains how party was threatened to enter into the contract. Hence if the contract is formed under duress, then the terms of the contract are not applicable. This is a complex factor and needs to be addressed under case by case basis. Undue Influence
This occurs when there is inequality of power that occurs between the contracting parties. In these cases, not all transactions would result in remedy. Undue influence is further divided into express undue influence and presumed undue influence (Andrews, 2015).
