澳洲西澳大学论文代写:纪念碑

澳洲西澳大学论文代写:纪念碑

战争纪念碑，方尖碑和拱门，石像都是关于澳大利亚风景的一些有趣的方面。纪念碑是关于这个地方的历史的象征。历史事件卷入冲突。具体来说，澳大利亚城市的法规是关于殖民者的。俯瞰着描绘土着人民的雕像。这些古迹和历史作品被认为是关于土着人被剥削的方式（Memmott＆Long，2002）。根据一些团体的描述，人们所感受到的持久的伤痕。有些团体提到这些纪念碑象征着历史的一部分，这是一个中立的提醒。这些相反的观点导致了更新的冲突得到发展。这一分析的目的是重新评估澳大利亚国家叙事中的雕像角色，并从社会学角度理解其意义。

澳洲西澳大学论文代写:纪念碑
关于国家古迹
澳大利亚人现在面临着如何看待过去事件的选择。从历史上看，澳大利亚白人曾经为殖民地时代提供过许多纪念碑。他们是历史的主要焦点。根据历史，在1800年，来自欧洲后裔的白人澳大利亚人是奴隶主，并且对土着澳大利亚人也采取了残酷的行动。从历史的角度来看，历史上某些事件是残暴的，也是压迫性的。一些国家古迹被认为是这些事件的象征。为了克服这些问题，还有为土着居民建造的纪念碑。
在这种范例中，土着人民的纪念碑和纪念碑数量有限。这是人民主要的论点。这种叙述中嵌入了天生的社会学重要性。这些在下面进行探讨。

澳洲西澳大学论文代写:纪念碑

War memorials, Obelisk and arch, stone statues are about some of the interesting aspect of the Australian Landscape. The monuments are symbolization about the history of the place. The events in history are embroiled in conflicts. Specifically, the statutes in the Australian cities are found to be about the colonizers. There is overlooking of the statues that depict the indigenous people. These monuments and historic pieces are considered to be about the ways in which the indigenous people were exploited (Memmott & Long, 2002). The enduring scars of the issues felt by the people are portrayed according to some groups. Some groups allude that these monuments symbolize a part of history and it is a neutral reminder. These opposing views have led to newer conflicts to be developed.
The purpose of this analysis is to reassess the role of statues from the Australian national narrative and understand its significance from a sociological perspective.

澳洲西澳大学论文代写:纪念碑
About National Monuments
Australians are now faced with a choice as to how they want to see their past events. Historically, the White Australians had raised many kinds of memorials as tributes to the colonial times. They were the main focus of the history. According to history, in the 1800, the White Australians from European descent were slave owners and also committed atrocious actions against the Aboriginal Australians. It is evident from the perspective of History that certain events in history are atrocious and were also oppressive. Some of the national monuments are considered to have been a symbolization of such events. To overcome these issues, there were monuments that were constructed for the Indigenous people as well.
In this paradigm, the number of memorials and monuments to the indigenous people are limited. This is the main argument that is made by the people. An innate sociological importance is embedded in this narrative. These are explored in the following.