澳洲社会学论文代写：裕元集团的劳资诉讼案件
澳洲社会学论文代写：裕元集团的劳资诉讼案件
被考虑的案件发生在2014年。这是一起涉及罢工、纠纷和集体谈判的劳资诉讼案件。裕元鞋业的工人与裕元集团进行了为期两周的讨价还价罢工。大约4万名工人参加了罢工。这被认为是继本田在中国发生的罢工之后最大的罢工之一。在这次罢工中被强调的一些问题，以及被讨价还价的一些问题，以低工资问题、社会保障问题以及公司其他安全问题的形式出现。这是一个日益增长的趋势，在大多数中国组织中都有体现。工资和安全福利的缺乏被认为是中国大多数工厂的问题，裕元集团也不例外(中国劳工通讯，2014)。这次罢工于四月结束。罢工的一些社会因素的核心问题是，在公司工作至少15年以上的中年工人的未来，他们在社会保障福利方面受到挑战。这次罢工规模巨大，参与罢工的有不同的劳工活动家、工人、警察、地方政府和工会(中国劳工通讯，2014)。
澳洲社会学论文代写：裕元集团的劳资诉讼案件
裕元工人签署的协议与他们所承诺的条款并不相同。大多数工人认为他们与公司的协议是永久性的，然而条款表明这些协议是临时性的。因此，合同的合法性和议价协议条款也受到了质疑。其次，社会保险覆盖是一个问题。从2011年起，中国的立法要求员工享受社会保险福利，法律规定雇主为员工购买社会保险套餐(Lee, 2014)。该福利包括养老金、医疗保健、工伤、失业福利、生育福利等。在裕元，该工厂只提供少数福利，而非全部福利。据称，该工厂可能是在政府官员的某种形式的沉默批准下运作，以缓慢的方式提供福利，就像过渡的情况一样。政府对这些组织提供这样的批准是为了帮助它们在不遵守规定的情况下继续经营，因为这将保持外国直接投资的稳定。
澳洲社会学论文代写：裕元集团的劳资诉讼案件
The case that has been considered happened in the year 2014. It was an industrial action case involving strikes, disputes and collective bargaining. A two week bargaining strike went on between the workers of Yue Yuen shoe manufacturers and the company. Around 40,000 workers were involved in the strike. This is considered as one of the largest strike after the Honda strike that happened in China. Some of the issues that were highlighted in this strike and that were being bargained for were in the form of low pay issues, social security issues and also that of other security issues in the company. This is a growing trend in most Chinese organizations are presented. The lack of pay and security benefits are seen to be the problems of most factories of China and Yue Yuen is no exception (China Labour Bulletin, 2014). This strike ended in April. Some of the core issues in terms of social elements of the strike were that of the future of middle aged workers who had been with the company for more than 15 years at the least and who were challenged when it came to social security benefits. The strike was an immense one in that it involved different labor activists in the strike, workers, police, the local government and the trade union (China Labour Bulletin, 2014).
澳洲社会学论文代写：裕元集团的劳资诉讼案件
The agreements that the Yue Yuen workers signed were not the same clauses that they were promised with. Most of the workers believed the deal they had with the company was permanent, however as the clauses indicate these were temporary in nature. The legitimacy of the contracts hence comes into the question and also the bargaining agreement clauses. Secondly social insurance coverage was an issue. As of 2011 the legislation in China requires employees to have benefits of social insurance, and employers are mandated by the law to buy social insurance packages for their staffers (Lee, 2014). The benefits package covers from pensions, healthcare, workplace injuries, unemployment benefits, maternity benefits and more. In Yue Yuen, the factory provided only few of the benefits and not the whole package of benefits, it was alleged that the factory might be operating with some form of a silent approval from the Government officials towards providing the benefits slowly like in the case of transitions. Government provides such approvals for organization in order to help them continue to operate even under noncompliance as this will keep the foreign direct investment stable.
