澳洲论文格式：塞内卡的《德拉》

澳洲论文格式：塞内卡的《德拉》

在《德拉》中，塞内加声称灵魂是统一的，因此没有精神冲突的地方。然而，一些口译员认为，塞内加所预测的愤怒情况都是失语症。可以说，塞内卡的愤怒描述显示了某种精神冲突。然而，塞内加否认了任何与精神冲突有关的可能性。他否认这两种行为之间存在任何冲突，这两种行为都与愤怒和采取报复行动有关。这反过来又排斥了真正的失弛缓症和恩克拉蒂亚现象。塞内加对愤怒的描述非常复杂，难以理解。他认为愤怒是一种情感，是一种以错误为回报的情感。他说，“做错了”和“寻求报复”这两个介词并不仅仅是一种无意识的冲动，它还涉及大脑。最初，塞内加认为愤怒是一种凶猛、好斗和疯狂的冲动。然而，后来他否认了这一说法，仅仅通过凶猛和侵略性来区分愤怒。
塞内加提出的所有关于愤怒的主张和声明都说明了愤怒是如何摧毁人民甚至国家的。他解释说，即使是智者也会受到愤怒的影响。德伊拉完全致力于研究愤怒的复杂性，这也解释了古代理论的一些重要方面。他发现自己赞同一些古老的理论，比如斯多葛学派;然而，声明中不够清楚。然而，塞内卡能够说服他的听众，不要说愤怒是错误的。塞内加的《德拉》讲述了愤怒的复杂性。塞内卡的《德拉》分析了一种情绪，那就是愤怒。愤怒理论可以扩展到所有情感理论。塞内加能够通过提供各种与政治有关的例子来说服他的听众，愤怒是错误的。他自己一生中也经历过许多灾难，这些灾难影响了她对愤怒的态度。

澳洲论文格式：塞内卡的《德拉》

In De Ira, Seneca claims that soul is unitary and thus there is no place for psychic conflict. However, some of the interpreters suggest that the cases of anger projected by Seneca are all akrasia. It can be argued that anger account offered by Seneca display some kind of psychic conflict. However, any kind of the possibilities related to of psychic conflict have been denied by Seneca. He denies that there is any kind of conflict between the two actions associated with anger and taking revenge in action. This in turn rejects the phenomena of genuine akrasia and enkrateia. Seneca’s account of anger is very complex to understand. He states that anger is the emotion, which is received in return of wrong. He says that two prepositions that ‘wrong has been done’ and person ‘seeks revenge’ is not just an involuntary impulse and it also involves mind. Initially, Seneca states that anger is ferocious, aggressive and frenzy impulse. However, later he rejects that claims by distinguishing anger with mere ferocity and aggressiveness.
All the claims and statements about anger, given by Seneca inform how anger can destroy people and even nations. He explains that even the wise man can be affected by anger. De Ira is completely dedicated to complexities of anger, which also explains some of the significant aspects of the ancient theories. He finds himself in agreement to some ancient theories like Stoic theory; however, sufficient clarity in the statements is not very clear. However, Seneca is able to persuade his audiences about stating that anger is wrong.De Ira by Seneca states about the complexities of anger. Seneca’s De Ira provides the analysis of the single emotion and that is anger. The theory of anger can be extended to theory of all emotions. Seneca is able to persuade his audiences that anger is wrong by providing various examples related to politics. He himself had faced many disasters in his life that influence her philosophy over anger.