澳洲论文代写：身份盗窃

澳洲论文代写：身份盗窃

通常，经典的身份盗窃需要6个月到几年的时间才能被确认。随着时间的推移，受害者所遭受的损失将会增加。一些使用，例如设置更多伪造的身份，实际上可能会导致长期的后果，即使在盗窃被发现之后。这样的影响会持续很多年，直到最后一个别名被发现并清除为止(Graeme， & McNally, 2005)。身份盗窃的解决方案和解决方案评估取决于盗窃的类型。例如，考虑通过网络钓鱼实现的身份盗窃(Romanosky et al.， 2011)。“网络钓鱼是一种获取个人信息的技术，其目的是窃取身份信息，使用的欺骗性电子邮件信息似乎来自合法企业。这些看似真实的信息旨在欺骗收件人泄露个人数据，如帐号和密码、信用卡号码和社会安全号码”(Kay, 2004, para。1).网络钓鱼邮件从用户那里获取数据(Fette et al, 2007)。
类似地，还有其他形式的身份盗窃，如公共工作站使用的嗅探器和扫描仪，或密码劫机者。现在，在网络钓鱼的第一种情况下，一个简单的拒绝匿名用户的邮件可以作为一个解决方案，但另一方面，在劫机者或病毒软件的情况下，得到自动加载程序，选择不是工作站用户(Jakobsson, and Myers, 2006)。截至2012年，身份欺诈每年给美国人造成210亿美元的损失。这些是根据收到的一些关于身份盗窃的投诉提出的。约18%的消费者投诉是关于身份盗窃的。据报道，2012年底，美国平均有1260万人是身份欺诈受害者，而2011年和2010年分别有1160万和1020万身份盗窃受害者(Finklea, 2014)。这类事件给消费者带来的成本增加了。例如，在2012年的案例中，每个欺诈受害者的成本为365美元(Finklea, 2014)。虽然低于平均费用成本，但仍高于10年前的水平(Finklea, 2014)。

澳洲论文代写：身份盗窃

Usually a classic identity theft would take anywhere from 6 months to years to be identified. With the time taken for the discovery, the loss that is suffered by the victim will increase. Some usages such as that of setting up of more falsified identities could actually result in long term consequences even after the theft is detected. Such impact is hence over many more years until the last of the alias is discovered and cleared (Graeme, & McNally, 2005).The solution for identity theft and the solution evaluation are dependent on the type of theft. For instance, consider the identity theft achieved by means of Phishing (Romanosky et al., 2011).“Phishing is a technique used to gain personal information for purposes of identity theft, using fraudulent e-mail messages that appear to come from legitimate businesses. These authentic-looking messages are designed to fool recipients into divulging personal data such as account numbers and passwords, credit card numbers and Social Security numbers” (Kay, 2004, para. 1). Phishing emails seek data from the user (Fette et al, 2007).
Similarly, there are other forms of identity theft such as sniffers and scanners used at public workstations, or passwords hijackers. Now in the first situation of phishing, a simple rejection of mails from anonymous users could serve as a solution, but on the other hand in the case of hijackers or virus software’s that get autoloader, the choice is not of the workstation user (Jakobsson, and Myers, 2006).Identity fraud as of 2012 is seen to cost Americans in the amount of 21$ billion per year. These are based on some of the complaints received on identity theft. Around 18% of consumer complaints are about identity theft. In the end of 2012 it was reported there were an average 12.6 million Americans who were identity fraud victims and this is a growth from the 11.6 million identity theft victims in 2011 and the 10.2 million victims from 2010 (Finklea, 2014). The costs to consumer because of such incidents have increased. For instance, in the case of 2012 it was noted that there were costs in the range of $365 per fraud victim (Finklea, 2014). While it less than the average expense cost, it is still seen to be higher than what it was a decade ago (Finklea, 2014).