澳洲论文代写-加拿大预测所售公寓的投资分析

从本篇澳洲论文代写-加拿大预测所售公寓的投资分析来看，加拿大市场分析报告显示，这个城市的住房市场对当地人来说日益难以承受。与迪拜和毛里求斯一样，迪拜正在成为更大的投资中心。住宅物业建设的主要目的是提高城市居民的经济承受能力。近期的调查显示，加拿大买家面临的市场压力高于平均水平，自2015年春季以来，情况持续恶化。市政府对外国人购房有一定的限制，因此，高收入增长或外国人投资的流入人口将受到限制。敏感性分析和现金流分析，在进行敏感性分析时，我们已考虑出售单位数目的变动对楼价变动的影响，分析的主要目的是澳洲论文代写-加拿大预测所售公寓的投资价格。

The valuation report has annexed herein with in annexure. The report has been certified by the valuation officers. The feasibility report has been prepared in accordance with the report of valuation officer with the special assumption made thereon.
Evaluation of key risks and proposals for risk management, identification of cost allowances within the appraisal
The key risk factors are as follows.
The other construction industry is also planning the same kind of venture.
The lower price, 2 bedroom flats made available in nearby areas are the main competition.
Company is planning to construct a super market nearby but the proposal has not approved yet.
Explanation of risk factors such as site/policy/legal constraints which will affect timing of payments, or levels of return
Risk factors associated with construction are as follows
Site:
If the multi-storeyed parking not prepared nearby, as proposed, the 2 BHK flats in locality will have its property value less than what it has estimated.
Legislation has some effort to bifurcate commercial and residential property which will decrease the property prices.

Given public expectations of government today, consider whether the Wednesbury test for unreasonableness has become too restrictive for modern society.
Wednesbury test for unreasonableness is one way to define an irrational decision as compared to a rational decision (Allan, 2006; Hilson, 2003). Now considering a test for irrationality, it has been maintained that the Wednesbury test as presented in the case of Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223 is too restrictive. It is so because of its nature to understand that a reasonable person’s and reasonable decision making is too fixed. In real time situations, this will not be the case. There will be no correct decision. The argument made in the Wednesbury is that the court will conclude on what could be reasonable for anybody or rational for anybody and then imposes it on the primary decision maker. Here the reality of administrative decision making is forgotten. The job of the court is to only assess for whether a decision making is rational or correct, and it should not be tasked with the job of providing a reasonable decision given any situation. The range of reasonable options are the decision makers choice and they should decide what they want to choose, not the court, and they should be judged based on those decisions.

留学生论文不会写怎么办，可以找澳洲论文代写Advanced Thesis平台机构，此代写论文平台为留学生们提供硕士论文代写、essay代写、report代写、assignment代写等论文服务，而且论文代写价格公平合理，不会出现论文抄袭的情况发生，如此良好的口碑和丰富的论文代写经验值得留学生选择和信赖！