澳洲论文抄袭：印度婚姻调查

澳洲论文抄袭：印度婚姻调查

调查中回答的总数为50。共推出75份表格，共收到50份回应，回应率为66.67%。受访者的平均年龄为22.4岁。26%的受访者年龄在18-22岁，48%的受访者年龄在22-26岁，6%的受访者年龄在26-30岁。36%的受访者是女性。64%的受访者是学生，其余的从事不同领域的工作。24%的受访者来自印度北部，16%来自印度南部，36%来自印度东部，24%来自印度西部。66%的回答来自城市居民。76%的受访者是印度教徒，68%是单身。22%的受访者是同性恋，12%是双性恋，66%是异性恋。对于所有回答有序的问题，增加值为1，中性或无变化值为0，减少值为-1。在所有这些响应中，大于0的平均值意味着更多的响应倾向于对应于1的响应，反之亦然。96%的受访者听说过同居关系，对同居关系持开放态度，并愿意与同居关系中的人交朋友。
然而，只有80%的人愿意考虑同居关系。相关问题的回答均值为0.8，标准差为0.404。0。8的平均值非常接近1，这意味着大多数人都听说过它。44%的人认为同居会降低离婚的几率，而42%的人认为不应该有任何改变。相关均值为-0.3，标准差为0.707。对响应进行编码，使下降值对应于-1，中性值对应于0。负平均数意味着大多数人认为同居关系结束后婚姻以离婚告终的可能性下降。64%的人认为同居关系会增加婚姻中的承诺，而30%的人认为不会有任何改变。平均回答为0.58，标准差为0.609。0.58的平均值意味着，更多的回应倾向于增加同居关系后的承诺。60%的人认为同居形式的同居可以增加婚姻的稳定性，36%的人认为同居不影响婚姻的稳定性。这里，均值是0。56标准差是0。577。

澳洲论文抄袭：印度婚姻调查

The total count of the responses in the survey is 50. Altogether, 75 forms were rolled out of which 50 responses came in, implying a response rate of 66.67%. The average age of the respondents is 22.4. 26% of the respondents were in the age group of 18-22 years, 48% in the age group of 22-26 years and 6% in the age group of 26-30 years. 36% of the respondents are female. 64% of the respondents are students while the rest work in different fields. 24% of the responses are from Northern India, 16% from South India, 36% from East India, and 24% from West India. 54% of the respondents live with family while others live independently or in hostels. 66% responses come from people living in urban areas. 76% respondents are Hindu while 68% are single. 22% respondents are homosexual, 12% are bisexual, and 66% are heterosexuals.For all the questions with ordered responses, an increase was given a value of 1, neutrality or no change was given a value of 0 and decrease was given a value of -1. In all these responses a mean greater than 0 implies that more responses favor the response corresponding to 1 and vice versa.96% of the respondents have heard about live-in relationships, are open to them and are willing to befriend those who are in live-in relationship.
However, only 80% of them are willing to consider live-in relationships as an option. The mean of the responses for the associated question was 0.8 with a standard deviation of 0.404. A mean of 0.8 is very close to 1 which means that most people have heard about it. 44% believe that live-in relationships decrease the chances of divorce in a marriage if it is preceded by a live in relationship while 42% believe that there should be no change. The associated mean was -0.3 and the standard deviation was 0.707. The responses were coded such that a decrease corresponded to -1 and neutrality corresponded to 0. A negative mean implies that majority believes that probability of marriages ending in divorce declines after a live-in relationship. 64% believe that live-in relationships increase the level of commitment in a marriage while 30% think that there will be no change. The average of the responses was 0.58 with a standard deviation of 0.609. The mean of 0.58 implies that more responses favor increased commitment after live-in relationships. 60% believe that cohabitation in the form of live-in relationships increase the stability of a marriage while 36% think that it does not affect the stability of marriage. In this case, the average turned out to be 0.56 and standard deviation was 0.577.