Secondly evaluation has considered whether the achievement of goals and objectives has been satisfactory. The purpose of evaluation is to check if the sate goals and objectives are met. The third purpose states are to check if the project management experience was good. Different stakeholders have been involved in the project management. The owner of the health care collaborative is the Health Ministry of Thailand, and similarly AusAid also shares primary ownership. Evaluation in this context has been done with respect the timeliness of implementation. Project management aims to ensure the required output is delivered within the right timeframe. Sub contractor project performance has also been evaluated. AusAID management resources have been used in the project as well as the National Resources of Thailand, and this project management evaluation assures both countries mutual satisfaction in the collaboration.
The sustainability of benefits as presented in the executive summary refers to the way the benefits are long time. For the project to be sustainable it has to be designed in such a way that it works with the existing infrastructure, system of doctors with greater financial sustainability. For the project to be sustainable it has to be designed in such a way that it works with the existing infrastructure, system of doctors with greater financial sustainability. The purpose of evaluation is also focused on how transferable the model was. The model that is being developed with respect to the Bamras is not just for that hospital, the intention of AusAID and the Thailand Government was to have a model implemented in the Bamras that would serve as a National training center for other HIV / AIDS treatment and care clinics around the country.
The use of previous literature studies is usually done to set the background context of the basis for the research. Previous literature evidence will also be useful to identify the gaps in literature. There is no specific literature review chapter in the report. The literature presented is supporting for the situation and is not general literature. There are no identification of gaps in literature as well.