澳洲essay代写：团队领导着的特质

澳洲essay代写：团队领导着的特质

一个特遣队领导将更成功地以更符合实际和更接近确定性的方式规划本组织的活动。然而，如果一个应急领导能够带领组织度过困难时期，我们不确定这是否是唯一的选择，但相比之下，一些组织更适合处于对大多数人来说根本不可能的情况。例如，对于一个财务顾问团队的领导者来说，当其他所有人都面临衰退的时候，可能是增长和聚集更多客户、获取利润的最佳时机。这种现象更为显著，而那些可能只专注于带领公司度过艰难时期的临时领导者，可能已经错过了成长的机会。因此，团队领导者是领导者的一个重要要求，但是仅仅停留在特定的特质上，可能会使领导者在逆境中错失机会。

澳洲essay代写：团队领导着的特质
特质是在更广阔的活动视野下定义领导模式的东西，例如，领导者的某些特质可能在特定环境中有用，而且当特质被识别和实现时，它会使过程变得更容易。人格特质被用来作为区分领导力和定义领导者的因素。诚信、能干、结果导向的领导者被称为具有各自领导特质的特质型领导者。对这一理论最大的批评是他们没有考虑到其他影响因素(Antonakis, Cianciolo and Sternberg, 2004)。特质论视野有限，并且考虑到它关注活动的狭隘性。扩大视野变得更为重要，因为由某一具体特征所界定的某一具体行动的影响可能并非在所有情况下都有用。

澳洲essay代写：团队领导着的特质

A contingent leader will be more successful in planning the events of the organisation in a way which is more appropriate with reality and closer to certainty. However, if a contingent leader is able to guide the organisation through difficult times, it is not sure whether that was the only option, but in contrast, some organisations are better placed in situations which look broadly impossible for most. For example, for a leader in the financial advisory group, the time when all others are facing the recession may be the best time for growing and gathering more clients and register profits. This is more phenomenal and the contingent leader who is only probably focused on taking the organisation through the tough times may have missed the opportunity to grow. Thus, the contingent leader is an important requirement for leaders, but being only stuck on specific characteristics will probably make the leader miss the opportunity in adversity.

澳洲essay代写：团队领导着的特质
Traits are something that defines the leadership patterns against a broader view of activity, such that some traits of a leader may be useful in specific settings and that it makes the process easier when the trait is identified and implemented. Personality traits are used as differentiating factors of leadership and defining leaders. Leaders with integrity, competence, and result oriented, are termed as trait leaders having the respective leadership traits. The biggest criticism of such a theory is that they do not consider other factors of influence under consideration (Antonakis, Cianciolo and Sternberg, 2004). The trait theory has a limited horizon outlook and considering the narrowness with which it focuses on activity. It becomes more essential to broaden the horizon as the impacts of a specific action defined by a specific trait may not be useful in all situations.