澳洲传播学论文代写-不合理行为的规则。不合理行为的规则有可能使企业处于不公平的优势(Finlay, 1999)。企业的目的是通过使用一些策略来确保他们能够销售一些东西。那么，这些策略本身能被称为不公平吗?在回答这些问题时，杰塞普法官最初宣称，没有理由认为有人有不合理的意图。他最初统治勒克斯“它没有进行不合情理的行为。他的荣誉基于一些发现，包括勒克斯的销售策略是传统的方法，客户应该知道;勒克斯的销售代表正在进入房屋，完成免费的维修检查;而那些可能感到压力的消费者则享受了10天的冷静期”(Ng， & Deakin, 2013)。
There is a chance that the rules of unconscionable conduct could put businesses at an unfair advantage (Finlay, 1999). The purpose of the business is to ensure that they are able to sell something by making use of some strategies. So can these strategies by themselves be termed as being unfair? In answering these questions, Justice Jessup initially declared that there was no reason to believe unconscionable intent was observed. He rules initially that Lux
“It did not engage in unconscionable conduct. His Honour based this view on a number of findings, including that Lux’s sales tactics were traditional methods which customers would be expected to be aware of; the Lux sales representatives were entering the houses to complete free maintenance checks; and consumers who may have felt pressured had the benefit of a 10-day cooling-off period” (Ng, & Deakin, 2013).
The use of technologies such as 3D printing is helpful for modelling and building prototypes for the customer who could give feedback on the prototype in a more immediate way and in this way, manufacturing adjustments are made when necessary in a timely manner. Consumer goods can be produced on demand rather than pursuing mass production. Usually, in traditional manufacturing, there is a necessity to mechanically assemble modules. The revolutionized supply chains that are being developed currently interconnect different manufacturing SMEs. Here the use of simple 3D printing will be helpful to print out the modules and there is no longer a need to wait. Tao et al (2014), in the context of intelligent engineering, discusses how cloud technologies can be combined with IoT in order to improve intelligent manufacturing that is more timely. Intelligent perception and timely accessibility is a necessity for the manufacturing industry. A five-layer intelligent resource perception is presented by the authors here, by which the accessibility system for resources is improved. While this is a prototype application, based on the application, the recommendation made for the Swift consultancy is that it has to learn to combine many technologies in order to get maximum efficiency. For instance, the 3D printing would be useful in the context of improvement on accessibility; however, the accessibility initiatives that Tao et al (2014) presents are more holistic and hence must be adopted as well. Consumer goods will be produced only when it is needed and there are no issues of excessive production, storage, inventory and more. Industry 4.0 standards combine both flexible manufacturing with the processes needed to make more efficient production methods. For instance, consider how additive manufacturing as described above is combined with that of injection moulding and other automated facilities. When combined with the prototype applications as suggested by researchers like Tao et al (2014), then maximum benefits will be reaped.
However, as seen in this case, the rules of unconscionable conduct are necessary. There are many cases in the context of contracting where it has been proved that in addition to a special disadvantage, one of the parties also should have had moral tainting (Dal Pont, 2000). In the case of the sales person, they did not just avail themselves of the time of the customer by tricking the customers into believing they were getting a free service, but also ensured they bought an overpriced vacuum cleaner. This form of a contract places the customer at a very unfair advantage. Should the customer be required to expect that a salesperson or a business would be deceitful with them? Or as in the case of the suppliers and Coles in the case of ACCC vs. should the suppliers be wary of the businesses they work with such as Cole and others? (ACCC, 2014b). It is the nature of a contract to ensure that all parties agree upon what they need and act on it in a way where both are benefitted. It is not the basic nature or principle of a contract to result in unfair advantage or exploitation. An unconscionable contract is really not an illegal contract. In an illegal contract, the content included in the contract would not be legal. On the other hand, in the unconscionable contract the content included will be legal. However, it will not be ethical. If such a contract was signed, then both parties of the contract would not benefit equally (Finn, 1988). One party would benefit unfairly at risk and loss to the other. In such a case a court intervention in the form of codes and rules for unconscionable contract is better.
澳洲论文代写Advanced Thesis网站平台是一家论文代写信誉高的留学教育机构，其中有24小时专业客服为留学们提供随时在线咨询服务，还有一些硕士论文代写、paper代写、essay代写、report代写、assignment代写等论文服务，澳洲论文代写Advanced Thesis 会以专业认真的教学态度来帮助留学生们完成学业目标，从而顺利拿到专属自己的学位证书！而且以上提供的论文范文，未经授权任何人不得私自转发，如有发现将依法追究其法律责任！