澳洲城市和乡村规划学论文代写： 城市景观
澳洲城市和乡村规划学论文代写： 城市景观
其他一些人则认为，城市景观与室外城市空间中的女性恐惧和脆弱性相比过于男性化（Matrix，1984）。随着这些规范性标准的变化，城市规划中的性别实践更加平等和平等，规划实践也发生了变化。这些变化已经开始于城市中心而不是农村生活，因为城市生活可以提供比农村生活更多的解放机会（Wekerle，1984）。女性作家们曾经讨论过如Wilson（1991）所写的这种解放形式的需要，
女性主义视角与城市规划相关的分析，除文献辩论外，没有得到太多的关注。已经进行的文学辩论表明，现实确实已经发生了转移。喧嚣的社区正在崛起，这些社区中包含的元素使他们更适合女性。邦迪（1998）认为，研究中提出的证据本身并不能使城市环境规划和女性主义视角更加明显。有些保密的课程需要更多的安全或财产划分。这些不一定是作者所说的解放女性的行为
“我不确定这三个爱丁堡社区可以推广到什么程度。但是，正如我所指出的那样，在每种情况下，建筑环境的形式似乎都是特定意义上的典型“（Bondi，1998，p.180）。
女权主义者的观点可以为规划者和理论家提供方法来理解如何构建政策来帮助高档化。高档化是满足现代女性需求的计划者的答案。邦迪（Bondi，1998）在研究论文中写道，设计和更多已经出现在更现代的时代，是支持女权主义观点的这种意义的。
结论
本文批判性地回顾了规划理论，城市可持续发展观和女性主义两个视角。这两者都为计划政策和实践的发展作出了贡献。这两个观点都有共同点，但在应用的背景下却有所不同。虽然第一个理论得到更广泛的倡导，但另一个则更为巧妙地被认为是适应平等机会女性的计划变革。这两种理论都对当代政策，住房和结构产生了影响。
澳洲城市和乡村规划学论文代写： 城市景观
Some other has represented the urban landscape as being too masculine as compared to the women’s fear and vulnerability in outdoor urban spaces (Matrix, 1984). With the change of these normative standards, and with more equality and equity in gendered practices of town planning, planning practices have changed. These changes have started with the urban centre more than the rural life as the urban life can provide for more emancipator opportunities than the rural life (Wekerle, 1984). Women writers have discussed the need for such emancipatory forms as Wilson (1991) writes,
The analysis of the feminist perspective as involved with urban planning has not received much attention except as seen in the literature debates. The literature debates that have been conducted shows that reality has indeed moved forwarded. Gentrified neighbourhoods are on the rise and there are elements included in these neighbourhoods that make them more suited to women. Bondi (1998) argues that the evidence that is presented in research does not not itself make the urban environment planning and feminist perspective more visible. There are prvieleged classes that need more security or property divisions. These needs not necessarily be the acts of the emancipator female as the author states
“I am uncertain of the extent to which it is possible to generalize from these three Edinburgh neighborhoods. However, as I have indicated, in each case, the form of the built environment appears to be typical in a particular sense” (Bondi, 1998, p. 180).
The feminist perspective can give planners and theorists ways to understand how policy could be structured to help gentrification. Gentrification is a planner’s answer to meet the needs of the modern women. The design and more that are already present in more contemporary times, removed from the times Bondi (1998) wrote the research paper supports this significance of the feminist perspective.
Conclusion
This essay has critically reviewed two perspectives in planning theory, the sustainable urban perspective and the feminist perspective. Both have contributed to the development of planning policy and practice. Both perspectives have elements of commonality and yet are different in the contexts of application. While the first theory is more widely advocated, the other is more subtly recognized as planning changes to accommodate the equal opportunity woman. Both the theories have an impact on contemporary policy, housing and structure.
